UNITED NATIONS
(AP) -- The five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council failed
to reach an agreement Wednesday on a British-proposed resolution that
would authorize the use of military force against Syria.
The
draft resolution - if it were to be put to a vote - would almost
certainly be vetoed by Russia and China, which have blocked past
attempts to sanction President Bashar Assad's regime.
Britain
put forth the proposal Wednesday as momentum seemed to be building
among Western allies for a strike against Syria. U.S. officials,
including Vice President Joe Biden, have charged that Assad's government
used deadly chemical weapons near Damascus last week.
The
U.S. has not presented concrete proof, and U.N. inspectors currently in
Syria to investigate alleged chemical attacks have not endorsed the
allegations.
After the ambassadors met for a
couple of hours at U.N. headquarters, the draft resolution was being
sent back to their governments for consultations, according to a Western
diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the discussions
were private.
The diplomat said Russia reiterated its objections to international intervention in the Syrian crisis.
U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power and British Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant left the meeting without commenting to reporters.
A
spokesman for British Prime Minister David Cameron said in London that
the British draft resolution would authorize "all necessary measures
under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter to protect civilians from chemical
weapons."
Chapter 7 allows the use of international armed force to back up U.N. decisions.
Speaking
Wednesday from The Hague, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said no action
should be taken until the U.N. chemical weapons inspectors finish their
work.
"Let them conclude ... their work for
four days and then we will have to analyze scientifically" their
findings and send a report to the Security Council, he said.
The U.N. said the analysis would be done "as quickly as possible."
Ban
also pleaded for more time to give diplomacy another chance to end the
more than two-year conflict that has killed more than 100,000 people.
But the secretary-general added that the Security Council must not go "missing in action."
No comments:
Post a Comment