DAMASCUS, Syria
(AP) -- A military strike against Syria from the United States and
its allies seemed closer to reality Tuesday as the U.S. defense chief
said weapons are in position to attack. Syria vowed to use all possible
measures to repel any such strike.
The
prospect of a dramatic U.S.-led intervention into Syria's chaotic civil
war stems from the Western assertion - still not endorsed by U.N.
inspectors - that President Bashar Assad's government was responsible
for an alleged chemical attack on civilians outside the capital of
Damascus last week.
Syria's foreign minister
said his country would defend itself using "all means available," while
in Britain, Prime Minister David Cameron recalled Parliament to hold an
emergency vote Thursday on his country's response to the alleged
chemical assault. Cameron said the goal of any attack on Syria, if
launched, would be to prevent the further use of chemical weapons.
French
President Francois Hollande added his voice to the growing clamor for
action, saying France is "ready to punish those who took the heinous
decision to gas innocents."
The Arab League
also threw its weight behind calls for punitive action, blaming the
Syrian government for the toxic attack that activists say killed
hundreds of people and calling for the perpetrators to be brought to
justice. The announcement by the 22-member body, which is dominated by
Gulf powerhouses Saudi Arabia and Qatar, provides indirect Arab cover
for any potential military attack by Western powers.
Syrian
Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem spoke at a press conference in
Damascus as condemnation of Assad's government grew over last week's
purported attack with poison gas. He denied that his government was
behind the attack and challenged Washington to present proof backing up
its accusations.
The United Nations,
meanwhile, said its team of chemical weapons experts in Syria had
delayed a second trip to investigate the alleged attack near Damascus by
one day for security reasons. On Monday, the team came under sniper
fire.
Al-Moallem likened U.S. allegations that
Assad's regime was behind the attack to false American charges that
Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction before the 2003 U.S.-led
invasion of that country.
"They have a history of lies - Iraq," he said.
"We
have the means to defend ourselves and we will surprise everyone," he
told reporters in Damascus. "We will defend ourselves using all means
available. I don't want to say more than that."
A
day earlier, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said there was
"undeniable" evidence of a large-scale chemical attack likely launched
by Assad's regime.
If President Barack Obama
decides to order an attack against Syria, it would most likely involve
sea-launched cruise missile attacks on Syrian military and
communications targets.
U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Tuesday that U.S. forces were now ready to act on any such presidential directive.
Hagel
said the U.S. Navy had four destroyers in the eastern Mediterranean Sea
positioned within range of targets inside Syria. U.S. warplanes were
also in the region, he told BBC television during a visit to the
southeast Asian nation of Brunei.
But any U.S.
military intervention in Syria was running into fierce opposition among
some members of Congress. A growing chorus of Republican and Democratic
lawmakers were demanding that Obama seek congressional authorization
for any strikes against the Assad regime.
In
Cyprus, Defense Minister Fotis Fotiou said naval traffic in the eastern
Mediterranean was very heavy with vessels from "all the major powers."
He also said Cypriot authorities were making plans to deal with a
possible exodus of foreign nationals from Syria.
But
Charles Heyman, a former British officer who edits The Armed Forces of
the UK, said the lack of a U.N. Security Council resolution authorizing
the use of force against the Syrian government greatly complicates
matters for the West. He said that may make it difficult for Cameron to
win parliamentary backing on Thursday.
Russia,
a permanent member of the Security Council, has steadfastly opposed any
international action against the Syrian government, a staunch ally.
"It's
clear the governments want some form of military operation, but if the
Security Council doesn't recommend it, then the consensus is that it's
plainly illegal under international law," Heyman said. "The only legal
way to go to war is in self-defense and that claim is difficult to
make."
Heyman predicted a possible three-phase
campaign, with the first step - the encirclement of Syria by Western
military assets in the air and the sea - already underway.
"Phase
two would be a punitive strike, taking out high-value command and
control targets and communications centers," Heyman said. "That could be
done easily with cruise missiles from ships and aircraft. Phase three
would be a massive takedown of Syrian air defenses, that would have to
be done before you could take out artillery and armor, which is the key
to long-term success."
In Rome, Italian
Foreign Minister Emma Bonino said Italy would not back any military
action against Syria unless it was authorized by the U.N. Security
Council - even though it considers the chemical attack to have been a
war crime.
Support for some sort of
international military response is likely to grow if it's confirmed that
Assad's regime was responsible for the Aug. 21 attack that the group
Doctors Without Borders says killed 355 people.
Ko
Colijn, director of the Clingendael Institute in the Netherlands and an
analyst who specializes in multilateral military issues, said the case
for intervention would be helped if the U.N. inspection team now in
Syria can reach a firm conclusion about whether chemical weapons were
used - and who is responsible.
If there is
clarity, he said, it could lead to "a diplomatic agreement" between
sparring Security Council members the United States and Russia.
In
an emergency meeting Tuesday, the Arab League also called on members of
the Security Council to overcome their differences and agree on
"deterrent" measures against those who committed "this heinous crime."
"The
council holds the Syrian regime totally responsible for this heinous
crime and calls for all involved in the despicable crime to be given a
fair international trial like other war criminals," the Arab League said
in a statement.
Obama has yet to say how he
will respond, but appeared to be moving ahead even as the U.N. expert
team on the ground in Syria tried to collect evidence from the attack.
The
U.N confirmed its chemical weapons team's mission faced a one-day delay
Tuesday to improve preparedness and safety after unidentified snipers
opened fire on the team's convoy Monday.
"The Secretary-General again urges all sides in the conflict to give safe passage and access to the team," the statement said.
In
Geneva, U.N. spokeswoman Alessandra Vellucci told reporters that the
U.N. inspection team might need longer than the planned 14 days to
complete its work. She said its goal now is to determine what chemical
weapons might have been used in the Aug. 21 attack.
"This is the first priority," she said.
---
Katz
reported from London. Associated Press writers Zeina Karam and Bassem
Mroue from Beirut, John Heilprin from Geneva, Lori Hinnant from Paris,
Menelaos Hadjicostis from Cyprus and Sarah El Deeb from Cairo
contributed.
No comments:
Post a Comment