GENEVA (AP)
-- Evidence suggests that some kind of "substance" was used in Syria
that may have killed more than 1,000 people, but any military strike in
response must first gain U.N. Security Council approval, special envoy
to Syria Lakhdar Brahimi said Wednesday.
Brahimi
spoke to reporters in Geneva as U.N. chemical weapons experts headed to
a Damascus suburb for another look at the alleged poison gas attack
near Damascus on Aug. 21 and as momentum built for Western military
action against Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime.
"With
what has happened on the 21st of August last week, it does seem that
some kind of substance was used that killed a lot of people: hundreds,
definitely more than a hundred, some people say 300, some people say
600, maybe 1,000, maybe more than 1,000 people," said Brahimi, who has
been the U.N. and Arab League's special envoy to Syria since August
2012.
"This was of course unacceptable. This
is outrageous. This confirms how dangerous the situation in Syria is and
how important for the Syrians and the international community to really
develop the political will to address this issue seriously, and look
for a solution for it," he said.
Brahimi did
not say on what he based his information, but he did discuss the work of
the U.N. team probing for evidence of the use of chemical weapons.
"The
United Nations has inspectors on the spot. They have already spent one
day in one area where this substance - whatever it is - has been used,"
he said. "They have come back with a lot of samplings, they talked also
to doctors, they talked to witnesses."
He said
his information did not come from Western intelligence, including what
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has called "undeniable" evidence of a
large-scale chemical attack likely launched by Assad's regime.
"What
we have been told is that this evidence that the Americans, the
British, the French say they have is going to be shared with us. It
hasn't been until now," he said. "And we will be very, very, very
interested in hearing from them what this evidence they have is."
Syria
has one of the world's largest stockpiles of chemical charges, but
denies the charges. U.S. leaders have not presented their proof, and
U.N. inspectors have yet to comment on the allegations.
Brahimi
called the civil war - which has killed more than 100,000, forced about
2 million refugees from their homes and displaced millions of others -
the most serious crisis facing the international community.
But
he said that any U.S.-led military action must first gain approval from
the 15-nation Security Council, whose five permanent members - Britain,
China, France, Russia and the United States - each have veto power. The
United States has been laying the groundwork for a possible strike on
Syria, but U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has urged nations to allow
more time for diplomacy.
Britain says it will
seek a measure "authorizing necessary measures to protect civilians" in
Syria. They want it drafted under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter, which
is militarily enforceable, when it is a political resolution that
doesn't mandate any specific actions.
"International
law says that military action must be taken after a decision by the
Security Council," Brahimi said. "I must say that I do know that
President Obama and the American administration are not known to be
trigger-happy.-What they will decide, I don't know. But certainly
international law is very clear: the Security Council has to be brought
in."
Military intervention would certainly
complicate Brahimi's efforts toward hosting a second Geneva peace
conference to find a political settlement in Syria, as a follow-up on a
June 2012 foreign ministers' conference, which isn't likely to occur
until October or later. Brahimi moved his base of operations to Geneva
this month for that reason, but he said Wednesday that he merely hopes a
conference can be pulled off by the end of the year.
Although he is "against military intervention by principle," Brahimi said decisive action must come soon.
"If
they are responsible for what has happened on the 21st of August," he
said of the Assad regime, "I don't think you will find many people who
think that this is the first outrageous thing that has been done by this
regime.
"One hundred thousand people have
been killed. Quite a few of them have been killed by the regime. So I
think, from my point of view, if there is one complaint about the
international community, it is that they haven't done enough before the
21st August. If they can do more after the 21st August, then that would
be great. "
No comments:
Post a Comment